I had
dinner with my mother and my family Sunday night. While there my
mother's church came up. As a boy my mother instilled a
sense of the importance of formal religion and religious community
for me which I value, and which has been of great benefit to me
through life, even though my preference for religious communities and
formal religion differs greatly from hers. In fact it differs so much
so at this point that I prefer not to go to her current church, less
because of the style and more because of the community. It's very
small. So when they share a sign of peace, literally everyone in the
church greets everyone else. Many of them coming up and hugging each
other. They're very excited about guests, and therefore have few
boundaries in terms of asking about where you go to church and if
you'll be back with them and such things. Not to comfortable for
someone looking to stop in casually.
But for
people looking for the support of a caring community, they can be a
pretty good place.
While
at dinner my mom told me about a man, I don't recall his name, who
she and her fellow church members believe to be homeless. He stopped
into the church about a week ago, and stayed to share in after church
refreshments with them. He humbly asked for food, and they provided
it, almost surprised that he felt the need to ask. While talking with
him, he talked about how much he liked it there with them and how he
wanted to study with them but he didn't have a Bible. So one of the
church members offered him a Bible and asked what kind he wanted, and
agreed to go get it for him. The following week as they were
preparing for service the woman who was supposed to get the Bible was
quite upset that, while helping someone else in the community, she
had not had the opportunity to go get the Bible. They looked through
what bibles the church had but they were all used, and they felt a
used Bible wasn't an appropriate gift for the new friend they were
welcoming. Eventually when they found a moment, one of them went out
to a store to pick up a Bible of the type the man had requested. The
man was overjoyed, and was clearly surprised that someone would say
they would do something for him and actually follow through.
The
story was simple, but was nice. Although it was a little sad that a
small act of kindness was a surprise for him. We, unfortunately, live
in a world where goodness and caring for others can often be a
surprise.
My
preference is not to get particularly political in this blog. I'm not
sure neutrality is still possible, but I'm going to still shoot for
it. That said, the idea of helping others and questions of who should
be doing it, what limits there are on our call to help others, and
how it should be done are major issues at the moment.
I can't
answer for us as a society what we should or shouldn't do. But these
questions are such that they often bring us back to questions of
religion and spirituality. The Pope has expressed the view that
Christians must welcome the stranger. 550 Catholics organized a Mass
in front of the White House to support this idea. We find other
religions also reaching out to help others in places where our
society has not been able to provide food, water, shelter, or safety.
In a lot of mainstream religious structures it's easy to say what
we're called to do or not do because they expressly state what to do
or not do.
But for
magicians we don't have that. We have a whole host of spiritual and
religious ideologies we might ascribe to, or might draw pieces from.
By in large though we approach them in very individualistic ways,
directly relating to the powers, forces, intelligences, and
divinities that inspire us. For many of us, that inspiration is often
very tied to our own personal development or to our particular
magical work, and less towards a social concept.
With
that in mind, maybe we each should turn to whatever spirits, or
whatever source we draw from, and find inspiration as to what our
answers are for ourselves. But if we do that we need to commit to
working with that inspiration to make manifest in the world whatever
it is we're called towards.
Short
of that, here are some thoughts I have on the matter. They're my
thoughts, and so of course no one is obligated to share or agree with
them. But I hope they might give you a jumping off point to explore
your own thoughts.
First,
magic isn't simply about ourselves. I have previously tried to get a
magical group to do more charity work. New leadership in that group
is fortunately excited about the idea of how we as a community can
help the broader community. But in the past some leaders were not as
fond of the idea of helping others, because, magicians, particularly
Thelemic magicians, work in a system focused on the self, and not the
community. It may be true that many magicians work in a manner
focused on themselves, but Thelema is not just about the self. The
Aeon of Isis was one focused on a communal ideal. The Aeon of Osiris
was focused on the individual. You have the circle which encompasses
the whole, and the point which resides solely as itself; you have the
cosmos and the singular star. The Aeon of Horus is the Aeon of War,
in the sense that the polarized qualities of Isis and Osiris must
come together to destroy their separateness and unify into a new
synthesis. The Age of the Child partakes of the individual and the
community. Thus the Hermit shines light into the world to inspire
others. The Master gathers a temple, the Magus ensnares souls with
his word. On the way to this unity, the Man of Earth explores the
forces of the cosmos, the Lover understands his angel and therefore
himself, and the Hermit combines the self and the cosmos into a
singular work. Knowing our Wills involves working our Wills within
the world, which is where Love comes in, we bring the world together
by individually contributing to a collective environment that allows
and inspires people towards their Wills. It is ultimately communal.
So...that's
a lot of words, but what does it mean? Magic is about action in the
world, and that action impacts others. Ideally our actions should
help us and those we care about, but in a way in which we also repair
the world and foster “magic” in the sense of moving the world
into a more initiated state. Even when we work for ourselves there is
a social element, an element of service, in magic.
So, my
first thought is again, that magic is not simply about ourselves,
magic is about impact on the world, and therefore the community
around us.
My
second thought is that the strong are called to help those weaker
than themselves. When I was a boy I was taller and stronger than most
of my peers. Now as a man I'm pretty average height. But I was almost
my full grown height in elementary school. My parents instilled in me
the idea that if you were bigger and stronger than others you
couldn't use that to take advantage of weaker people, and you were
obligated to protect those who couldn't protect themselves from
people who are stronger than them.
Maybe I
don't have a good magical justification for accepting this ideal, but
is seems like one which to me is sensible. Maybe we don't have to be
superheroes, although this seems in line with Jonathan Kent's
morality or Ben Parker's with power comes responsibility. There are
things we can't do. We aren't invulnerable or all powerful. But we do
have access to knowledge and power that others do not. Sometimes it
can allow us to provide them the help that they need. We might not be
obligated to help, but in cases where we can, we have to recognize
that we make the decision not to.
So my
second thought is that if magicians have power that others do not,
and we can within reason use that power to alleviate suffering, we
make an active choice either to do so or not to do so, and we are
responsible for that choice.
My
third and final thought for today on this matter is “Compassion is
the vice of kings.” When I was starting out in Thelema and the
Thelemic community this line was often quoted as a call to be an edgy
bad ass. “Stamp down the wretched and the weak,” clearly, we're
not called to be compassionate, it's a vice. We should be focused on
our OWN wills as individuals. This was the kind of sentiment I saw a
lot. Maybe it wasn't the prevailing sentiment at the time, maybe it
was. I liked to interpret it differently, and I'm finding now a lot
more people have also come to this conclusion and have become more
comfortable vocalizing it...the line is a call towards compassion.
“Vice
of kings” can be re-rendered as “kingly vice”. While the word
vice is of primarily negative meaning, Liber AL seems to creatively
flip language on it's head at times. Love is clearly something
necessary in the context of Liber AL. Compassion is a form of Love,
and it is a form of love which is dangerous when given over to it too
easily, too often, and too completely. In fact the Fraternity of
Saturn attempted to clarify Love in the context of the Law of Thelema
by adding “compassionless love” as a descriptor. But stars move
in a coalescence of the gravity of the various stars, planets, and
bodies of space. The universe sings in a harmony. The cosmos is in
and of itself a form of compassion, or a coming together of things
which share in influence and impact. Perhaps then compassion is not
the vice of kings in the sense that true kings reject compassion, but
rather that a true king masters compassion, experiencing it and
drawing on it as is suited to his will, but like any other dangerous
influence, no further than those bounds which are suited to his will.
Compassion is his burden, because it allows for his magical
interaction with the world, but taken too far could also topple it.
A
successful king understands his kingdom and the people in it. He
recognizes that his success, his growth, the longevity of his
kingship is tied to the way in which he cultivates his kingdom and
the experiences of those therein. Jupiter and Sol are the icons of
kingship in western magic. Jupiter is the source of beneficence and
providence. Kings provide mercy and fecundity for their children,
those within their kingdom who are dependent upon their reign. Sol
provides justice, balance, and through those healing, but also
illumination and inspiration. Sol is the beauty of ordered virtue
made radiant upon those around it. The relationship of a virtuous
reign to fecundity and growth is seen in the physical counterpart of
the force of Sol, our Sun and its ability to support life.
True
kingship is not about looking down upon the wretched and despising
them. Kingship is about balance, about ordering the forces within a
kingdom, and fostering the flow of growth and prosperity.
So my
third and final thought is that a magician, in order to be kingly,
and take part in the power of a king must shoulder the burden of
compassion.
So
maybe as magicians, we aren't called to welcome the stranger, feed
the poor, clothe the naked, and heal the sick...although...some of
that sounds like it's precisely in line with what Rosicrucians are
required to do...we are, in any case, in a position to consider what
is right for us, and what our roles in society and the world are.
Ultimately we can't individually decide for our neighbor or our
country what the one true course of action is. But we can decide for
ourselves what is and what isn't right for us to do, and from there
we can decide whether or not we're going to do that thing which is
right or not. In the end we are left with our feelings to answer to
as to whether or not we've lived up to our inspiration.
No comments:
Post a Comment